http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16175795
The above BBC article uses black and white photography to disguise the criminal Nordine Amrani's true roots. It is a sordid attempt to portray him as Belgian, rather than what he actually is - Moroccan. The reason for this is because the BBC propaganda network couldn't possibly allow the world to realise just how bad the foreign crime is. It might be cause for concern. As well as waking people up to the fact that multiculturalism does not work. If you stick a turd in with a load of decent food, the turd doesn't become edible or decent, it soils the food completely. The same goes for the ideology of sticking criminals and scum in decent neighbourhoods and countries - the good does not rub off on them, their bad rubs off on the decent people, thus creating more scum. And naturally that is the idea. Of course the rich will not suffer the same injustice. They can afford to not live next door to paedophiles, murderers, rapists and thieves.
Amrani had been in trouble with the police pretty much all of his life. He was due in court on the day of his attack, killing at least four people and wounding 120. And though he had been in trouble before for growing cannabis and possessing a large arsenal, he was acquitted for having the correct permissions.
As usual the BBC, like all official media networks, does its very best to keep race out of the crime. Regardless of the fact that race does play a major part in crime statistics. This is to supposedly protect the human rights of the criminal. The same does not go in the case of a white criminal - especially when the crime is supposedly a racist attack - in which case the white shall be ridiculed and the entire white race deemed racist for it.
In one recent case of supposed racism in England, which can be found on youtube: 'My tram experience'. A white woman daring to voice her opinion was filmed, the woman was arrested for speaking freely and her child placed in to care - where it will no doubt be mentally, physically and emotionally molested by the state. Well done multiculturalism and freedom, once again you have served us well.
The police conveniently ignored the black man behind her, who was about to get up and violently assault the woman in question, his girlfriend persuaded him not to though. I suppose in the eyes of the law he was provoked and therefore it was not his fault?! Although the white woman could not possibly have been provoked by any of the foreigners around her, that could never happen.
What is the world coming to?!
Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts
Saturday, 17 December 2011
Thursday, 24 November 2011
Crime doesn't pay... Or does it?!
From what we have rammed down our throats, starting from a very early age. One would believe, that the legal system, is there to help people who fall victims to evil criminals. Once upon a time, this was true. In the days when justice, was actually served. Today, the law protects the criminals from being justly punished, for their evil crimes. Most crimes don't even reach the news papers these days, unless they are racist crimes, (mostly, crimes commited by whites against other races), crimes against the government, some stronger or milder crimes reach the newspaper. But when it comes to other races persecuting whites, it is rarely even mentioned (mostly being displayed in a small paragrapth, somewhere barely noticeable). And so people are lead to believe, that racism AGAINST whites, never happens. This of course, is deliberate. Because, it allows political correctness and the liberal agenda, to easily be enforced.
If the newspapers were to tell the truth about dealers, or drug related crimes etc, people would be outraged. Even more so if they knew that the criminals, are in no way punished. Instead, they're treated as victims themselves. With no consideration, for the actual victims of these criminals. England is a highly developed police state. With CCTV monitoring pretty much everywhere (these days). A network of paid informers, provide a constant flow of information. In addition to CCTV in towns, all the major roads networks are covered by CCTV, with number plate recognition technology. There are also military listening posts, which monitor every text message, email, telephone conversation and Internet activity, in which originates, or ends in this country. With this mass of information, the police are aware of every business transaction committed by criminals, such as drug dealers, people traffickers, paedophiles and pimps. Why then, is there such a slow (if any) response to these crimes?
The opium fields were taken control of by the state. When America and Britain invaded Afghanistan in 2002, these fields had previously been burnt down by the Taliban. But since the troops moved in on this area, the crops have been regrown. Surprise, surprise, the heroin market has never been more busy, or free flowing. And since this is an Asian drug found only in Afghanistan, it is quite obvious that only Asians and the military, would have access to these drugs. Thus narrowing the heroin drug dealers down slightly. But if the troops control these fields shouldn't it be rather difficult to smuggle this drug? Strangely it seems not. Of course the only conclusion that can be drawn from this, is that the state are the true drug dealers. Using the foolish Asian dealers to smuggle. And selling it to the even more foolish addicts for a profit. But why would the state want to allow such an evil, dirty, drug to be so obtainable? Perhaps because, "Heroin leaves the person taking it in a state - where they are blissfully unaware of anything that matters. Unable to think rationally. Unattached from any real human emotions. It makes the addict feel safe. Like they are surrounded by cotton wool. Nothing can touch them." As it leaves the addict experiencing no feelings of emotion, they are more likely to be dangerous to those they steal from, in order to get their next fix. This drug leaves them with no common decency. Which means, when most of them steal to pay for their drugs, they will be fine with mugging, burgling, shoplifting, shamelessly victimising innocent people. They will heartlessly steal from young children, even if it is as little as £1. They will break in to your house, if you are unfortunate enough to be home, they will attack you, then rob you. Some heroin addicts, pay for their habit by selling their bodies to the dealers. As well as the dealers friends. Some, even build up a network of customers outside the drug circle. Grievously, it is not unusual, for some of these girls selling their bodies, to not even have reached double figures in age.
Heroin, keeps people from being a threat to the system. It keeps addicts from thinking about anything, except naturally, their next hit. Much the same as alcohol, keeps those sticking to the law from thinking much at all. It lowers the brain activity. Thus closing the mind off. Leaving the drinker in a state where they can barely think at all. It is not good for the body in any way. In fact, it is more dangerous than natural hallucinogenics. (Which taken properly, can be very beneficial both mentally and physically). Yet it is still legal to drink very dangerous alcohol. While, natural hallucinogenics such as, mushrooms, or cannabis are illegal. Even though they are good for you when used correctly. And open up the mind to new experiences and knowledge. Cannibis, has already proved to have healing benefits for patients of severe illnesses, or injuries.
Criminals, tested and found guilty of having heroin in their system, are given drugs orders on probation. Instead of going to prison, they have to go on a methadone prescription. These criminals are given drug tests, ranging between twice weekly, or once fortnightly. Everything that the addicts need (provided they have committed a crime), is payed for. Including housing, bills, food, drugs, clothes, shopping, furniture, electrical goods, days out, education, TVs etc. On top of all this, they still receive incapcity benefit/jobseekers allowance/income support. They are of course, free to do whatever they want.
Human rights exist not to help those who have had theirs violated. But to protect those who have violated the rights of others. When a drug addict commits a crime, they do not get punished... Unless it is a crime against the state - such as contempt in court. For example telling a judge that he is an out of touch moron. Which in most cases is the truth. Some of the sickest crimes to be committed these days, still receive no punishment. Evil crimes such as - paedophilia, rape, mugging, murder, assault and burglaries. These criminals are left free, to commit such crimes again. In many cases, these criminals are even moved in to areas with normal, law abiding citizens. Leaving innocent people to suffer from such crimes. Yet, I would imagine areas where the rich and powerful (such as the government) live you will find none! The rich live in walled communities. Which have CCTV surveillance, security guards, not to mention plenty of other expensive measures. (at the tax payers expense - of course), Which insures only the ever protected rich and powerful, have access to these properties.
And liberal morons ensure that criminals are spread across the country. Ruining the lives of the hard working decent English. This clearly excludes their own people, which are very carefully guarded.
People who make the law, protect people who break the law. Those who pay for the crimes of the state and the scum they create, are the ordinary people. Who get daily screwed by the rubbish in charge of the country. As well as the rubbish who would be in gaol, if there was any sanity in this country.
People who make the law, protect people who break the law. Those who pay for the crimes of the state and the scum they create, are the ordinary people. Who get daily screwed by the rubbish in charge of the country. As well as the rubbish who would be in gaol, if there was any sanity in this country.
(By the way, for people who don't understand what the word gaol means, that is the English spelling of the word which Americans would call a penitentiary - or jail).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
