9/11 State brain washing techniques part three:

Media fear mongering, as always.

Wednesday the 2nd of may (2012) marked the official one year anniversary of the death of Osama Bin Laden.  And of course the media, in remembrance of the CIA official Osama, have marked the occasion with fake terrorist threats and fear mongering in preparation of the 2012 Olympics.
Happily ignoring the fact that Mr CIA official Bin Laden has been dead since 2001.  He died of natural causes in the care of a CIA hospital. 
The official story involves Osama Bin Laden's body being buried at sea within 24hours of his alleged death.  The media pushes the idea that this was in keeping with the practice of the Islamic beliefs.  Although of course it is a cover up.  Bin Laden at sea.
If Bin Laden had not been a CIA official, and had actually been an independent terrorist (rather than state owned terrorist) he would not have been shown such compassion as this.  His body would have been brought back for a proper examination - with proof shown to the public that it was truly him.  And he would have been made an example of.  But of course, since Bin Laden died ten years earlier, it would have been pretty difficult to gain such proof and so a cover up was needed.

But the 2011 lie of catching and murdering Bin Laden has definitely served its purpose, it has allowed the establishment controlled media to further install fear in to the minds of the masses, with a constant bombardment of terrorist threats.  As well as restrictions of freedom.  And not forgetting the extreme measures to attack, I mean protect the people, such as army bases and missile launchers.  But rest assured, these means are for your own safety and will removed after the Olympics... Sounds like a very familiar lie, doesn't it?!
The missile launchers will most definitely not be removed.  They are just a starting point for the rest of the country.  They will appear every way as an alleged safety measure after the establishment orchestrated terrorist attack on London.  But instead of being there to protect us, they will be there to prevent us from defending ourselves from the people who actually want to kill us - the Zionist establishment!
Missile launchers.
This article attempts to promote the idea of missile launchers being placed in London.  If there is such a worry of terrorism, why allow the Olympics to take place if it is such an obvious or suspected target?!

Since Bin Laden's 'official death', many threats of terrorism, and fake attempts have been carried out to scare the public in to further submitting their freedom - as well as to prepare us all for the establishments attack on the Olympics. 
This article refers to one such fake attempt:  Establishment propaganda.
It is possible that the alleged terrorist was also a part of the CIA.  Or, perhaps they just decided to pick someone at random to further promote the growing war in innocent countries.  Remember this, to the people at the very top - Zionists - we are little more than insects that they will happily squash.  No one knows who is at the top, because they have so many levels of servants working for them.  To protect their identities they ensure that no one knows more than two levels above themselves.  And this is the case in all forms of slavery these days, I mean employment. 
This fake terrorist attempt was also enough to justify full body scanners.  Such an invasion of privacy should never be allowed.  But since it is only their to protect you, why would you question it?!  In reality however, it is only their to enslave you.  To restrict your freedom and prevent you from ever protecting yourself from the establishment. 
It is not the first time the Zionist establishment have attempted to control and enslave us.  In fact they have tried and failed at this countless times.  Which is why this attempt involved a great deal of intellect and planning.  Years of working towards their goal was involved, and the outcome?!  They have us exactly where they want us.  Many events in history led up to these people gaining control.  And the only reason we are unaware of it is because we have swallowed all of the lies and the truth has been hidden and forgotten.
They have taken such precautions this time, not only are we unaware of their plan to destroy us, but also we are completely at their mercy, unprepared and unable to protect ourselves from anything they do to us.

The London Olympics has been deliberately built on a radioactive site.  And the establishment know this.  The official lie is that this radioactive waste is low threat - this is just to convince us that it is no danger.  However even low threat radioactive waste is extremely dangerous and will still harm us.  It is the classic lie that low levels of poison are safe - are we really stupid enough to believe this?!
Apparently so, because we also believe that microwaves are safe - microwaves radiate our food - in other words they make our food radioactive and kill any of the foods nutritional value, replacing it with cancer causing radiation.

As seen in this image, the Olympic stadium consists of the typical Zionist symbolism, look at the lights - they are shaped as pyramids with the capstone missing/separated and the all seeing eye.  This kind of symbolism can be seen all over England, and many other countries.  It is a sign of their control over us.  And is portrayed on most architecture these days.  Once you learn what their symbolism looks like and means, you will begin to notice just how many buildings, films, money notes etc are used to show this symbolism. 

Look at this image carefully, what do you see you?  If like most people you simply see the 2012 London Olympics symbol, you need to look again.
Do you see the dot in the middle?  Look at the image below to see why that dot is there...

Do you see now?  It spells out 'Zion'.  And if you are daft enough to consider the dot a coincidence, think again.  The dot only makes sense if it is meant to spell out the word Zion.  And the symbol was not just designed by chance, and the dot was not a simply mistake - it was planned out and created as it was meant to be - to spell out 'Zion'.
This is another example of the kind of symbolism they use.  It all serves a purpose.  We are influenced and affected by thing our conscious mind doesn't even notice.  Because our unconscious/subconscious mind is aware of it.  That is how brain washing affects us - by speaking to your subconscious they can hypnotise and control you - without your conscious mind ever realising it.  Certain imagery, or words spoken will only reach us on a subconscious level - in order to speak to our subconscious they have to hide their meaning in plain site so as not to awaken our suspicious conscious mind.
And if you think this is all a bit far fetched - think on.  They have the means to brainwash/hypnotise masses of people all at the same time TV, media and the internet etc.  And through many forms of manipulation, as well as psychological testing (creating psychological profiles - used to catch criminals) - we have volunteered our thoughts and information - providing them with adequate information to easily corrupt masses of people all at the same time. 

Let us look at another form of symbolism regarding the 2012 olympics.  What do you see here?!
The mascot on the left has on top of it, a pyramid with an eye.  One of the very common forms of symbolism used by Zionists - it is the all seeing eye.
Also the mascot on the left is a phalic symbol - which not only represents the corruption of innocent minds, but also it is the worship of Nimrod - also known as Baal the sun God.  True meaning of Easter - Ishtar. Sun worship.
Both mascots have only one eye - which is of course the all seeing eye - and is why many singers on their pictures have one eye covered, or one eye with a flash of lightning painted over it - to accentuate the one eye.

It doesn't take much to see what is going on here.  Research it for yourself and come to your own conclusion.  Never accept the official media stories, or anything else to that effect.  Question everything.

For anyone who reads the news, or watches it for that matter - you will probably have noticed that we are being deliberately scared by the stories.  And desensitised to the violence.  The best way to create a subservient people is to scare them in to submission.  And this is exactly what the establishment are doing.  Please see my other articles on the Olympics, as well as my information on 9/11.  And research it all for yourself.  Questioning everything is not a negative thing, it is perfectly natural.  We should question things.  To mindlessly accept everything we are told is unnatural and very destructive.

2012 Olympics attack on Big Ben; Update:

This is a quick update for my article: 2012 Olympics; future attack on London.  I recently discovered an article in the Telegraph, dated 3rd of February 2002; the article was about Al-Qa'eda, and referred to an alleged attack on Big Ben.  This supposed terrorist manual, is dedicated to Osama Bin Laden and Abdullah Azzam.  Osama is a CIA operative who has been dead for ten years, at the very least.  He died in a CIA hospital.   The telegraph were obviously preparing us (ten years early, as they often do) for the 2012 attack on Big Ben.  Which can then be blamed on some poor Muslim country, that will be subject to bombings for oil and control.  As well as the torture and rapes committed by most scumbag soldiers.  One does not need to look very far for the countless evidence showing how common this is!

Here is the manipulating article I referred to:  Telegraph.

Ten years before 9/11 we were prepared for the event with manipulating media horror stories.  And this is exactly the same thing.

The Telegraph claims that this falsified document contained tips on how to raise money through kidnappings and such evil acts, and mentioned targeting the Jews.  As always, the Jews 'have' to be the victim.  If they're always the victim, then they can never be at fault in the minds of the moronic liberal robots.  It also pushes the retarded EDL (anti English defence league) to further support Zionist Israel/terrorism - in a bid to attack all things linked to Islam.  Once again the poor Muslims are being used as a scape goat for the real terrorist, and culprits of the terrorist attacks.

The media have already planted the idea in our minds that Big Ben will be a target.  They have even flaunted the idea in many films and cartoons that have been released over the last few years.  And now as we get closer to the time, Muslims are being portrayed as evil criminals in the news papers, that up until recently painted them as saints.  News papers and Liberal minded robots, previously treated any criticism of a Muslim as racist.  But now that they once again need to use Islam as a scape goat for the crimes of a corrupt establishment they are making sure Muslims appear to be evil and getting ready to attack us.  And all this is just to justify murdering millions of innocent Muslims in their own countries!

Despite how far fetched some of you may find this, you have to stand further back from a painting to fully appreciate the entire work.  And the same goes for what is happening in the world today.  If you are too close to the image portrayed by the lying media, then you cannot fully see what is happening.  It is almost like the act of pick pockets, keeping your attention focused elsewhere so that you do not notice you are being robbed!

Radical feminists: man hating Lesbians.

The ideology of feminism first came to light in the early 19th and 20th century (first wave feminism), under the guise of fighting for equality and a woman's right to be involved in the running of the country.  The suffrage movements encouraged women to believe they were being oppressed.  The movement proposed that women fight for suffrage (the right to vote) and to be treated as equals to men.
Women from middle class backgrounds were easily persuaded by the notion.  And no doubt the media lies did little to advise them otherwise.

Feminism was created as a way to separate a woman from her nature.  And to destroy the family way of life, by convincing women that they were being oppressed in fulfilling their natural instincts in life - to procreate, raise their family and look after the household, in other words be a housewife and mother.  How can such an important role be seen as a chore, or state of oppression?!

The real reason feminism was so desperately pushed was to allow for the free sex (women) to be enslaved just as men had for centuries.  Although the ideology ignores the fact that lower class females and children had been forced to work in criminally dangerous work conditions in order to survive.  Feminism was never about equality.  It was about separating a wife from her husband, a mother from her child, destroying the family life and connection between mother and child - in order to create even more slaves of the female middle class variety.

Second wave feminist activity began in the early 1960s, and suggested that patriarchal family life oppressed women.  It promoted the idea that looking after children was a chore.  And women were wasting their potential, potential meaning ability to be a slave to the establishment perhaps?!  Domesticity soon became something to be ashamed of.  Women were told to believe that there was something negative about fulfilling the role of a housewife or mother.

In 1949 Simone de Beauvoir concluded that women were perceived as the "The Second Sex", in her work, merely because of their ability to menstruate, procreate and lactate.
Which again promotes a woman's natural instincts and role in life as something negative.

Betty Friedan, in her book "The Feminine Mystique", she stated that the family image of that time was degrading to women and did not reflect happiness.  Exactly what part of a mother raising and nurturing her child as nature intended, is degrading to women?!  It is the most important role in existence.  A mother is responsible for moulding and shaping her children in to who they will be as adults, and her children are a credit to her.  This sickening book was responsible for the kick start of the second wave of feminism, which allowed for middle class women to become slaves to the establishment just as lower class women already had in despicable conditions.

Second wave feminism still seems like a noble movement in today's mindset, as it supposedly fought for equality in pay and such.  However, as it stands the supposed inequality in pay was justifiable in some ways.  Men were paid more because they were the sole providers for their family.  And were capable of much more strenuous work.  Whereas single women were only providing for themselves or parents, and were capable of less in terms of strength.  This ideology would later allow single women to provide for out-of-wedlock children.  And for those children to be left with state indoctrinated 'carers'.  Thus diminishing the family life and parent-child bond.

In modern society, feminism has taken an even more destructive and radical turn - being mainly an ideology for man hating lesbians.  And many of these man haters are in powerful, or at least important positions and so have a great influence in political or influential terms.

Radical feminism goes so far as to call for the violent slaughter of men and male children.  Its political influence has oppressed men for years using the lie of sexism to further destroy a mans rights.  If the fight were truly ever for equality, men would also be allowed to experience some.  However, as it stands men are being punished, as it seems, for their supposed crimes of treating women as housewives and mothers.  Or in other, more truthful words, looking after them and keeping them from a life of slavery.

Radfem hub (Radical feminist), is a website recently exposed for emphasising articles from man hating feminists, of a severely destructive and violent nature.
Here is the entire article exposing how feminists REALLY think:  http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/radfem-hub-the-underbelly-of-a-hate-movement/

The article shows screen shots of feminists and their opinions of how to deal with men.  Some of which I will post below.

 Laila Namdarkhan (screen name “ybawife”), a well known feminist activist who was instrumental in passing legislation in the U.K. Regarding the mental health of women in prisons;

Above calling for the abortion of male babies.  And justifying it by stating female babies have been aborted.  Not only sickening, but also a retarded mentality.  Feminists are mentally ill from being indoctrinated and raped mentally by the establishment and media lies.  The comment exposes a truly unhealthy and sexist attitude towards males of any age.

Danielle Pynnonen (screen name “Allecto”), a child care worker whose employer is unknown;
 This child care worker is obviously incapable of looking after children.  She has an unhealthy attitude towards the males she 'supposedly' cares for and holds them in contempt for merely having the XY chromosome.  She refers to the male she cares for as a future rapist, and clearly this is how she sees all males.  She is a serious threat to children, and males especially for this reason.  

 Kat Pinder (screen name “Amazon Mancrusher”), a community development coordinator for the City of Perth in Australia and former U.K. Game show Big Brother contestant;
 This feminist suggests that men should be raped and battered (as if men are never victims of these things anyway, women also batter their husbands it is very common, just less reported because of the embarrassment factor), and also she describes general housework as a degrading task that men should have to endure to suffer as women have - although it is not degrading at all it is merely a part of life.  She then refers to low paid jobs - although this hasn't been an issue for some time for women.  And many men do have to work in low paid and degrading jobs.  She also mentions men should be purchased from brothels.  She is suggesting that women are forced in to that line of work, however this is far from true.  Most women who do this, choose to because it is easy money.  Or they wish to pay for their drugs.  And in most cases where a woman or young girl is forced in to prostitution, in England alone, it is due to Asian drug dealers - who get them hooked on heroin and then coerce them in to paying for the drugs through sexual activity with the dealer and his friends.  Eventually the dealer pimps her out to other Asians who may not be in his tight circle of friends.  This is a well known fact in the drugs intervention services.  Although it is not highly publicised because it may promote racial hatred.

 Mary Syrett (screen name “Mary Sunshine”), a writer and member of the City of Kingston Arts Council in Ontario, Canada;

This woman suggests that women should not nurture their male babies.  She states that females are forced to give birth to baby boys, but after that a woman can choose not to care for him and ensure his development.  She constantly refers to it being a woman's choice what to do with a male baby after birth - she seems to hint at a tremendously savage solution to the male population problem.  And she obviously is very against a male future - she would perhaps prefer men to never be needed and for all procreation to be artificial.  And this is seen as a sane mentality?!

 Lorraine Allen (screen name “White Tiger”), a special education teacher at The Center for Discovery Hurleyville, New York;
 A special education teacher - I believe this means she works with mentally handicapped children?  And at the boys statement, which he probably does not even fully understand the meaning of, she suggests that she would like to throw him out of an unopened window.  And she is allowed to work closely with children?!  Sickening isn't it?!

 Man hating feminist lesbians have an unhealthy attitude towards all men.  Many feminists with these disgusting, utterly destructive and dangerous opinions hold strong influential positions and are working towards changing the political aspects and laws.  They basically wish to imprison men with the same kind of oppression they're supposedly against.  They have been raised to hate men.  But because they're feminists they are allowed to have their evil man hating opinions.  Such is the way of political correctness, in a maddened and corrupt society.

The establishment have gained greatly from this self destructive attitude, the family has been destroyed.  Children are raised by a paedophile state that daily destroys their mind with lies, women have been enslaved.  Feminism has corrupted women to the point of sexual perversion and violent hatred of men.  Control of the masses has been gained.  In first destroying women, they had half the population.  Then they killed off the strong men in the wars, leaving behind the weak to breed a generation of weaklings and intellectually inferior shadows of the former greatness.  Now we are left with the heavily indoctrinated rubble, that mindlessly follow, and feel an indescribable need to be led.  Very few see past the establishment and media lies and propaganda.  The education systems ensure that the younger generations do not question this cancerous way of life.  Thus allowing control to remain in the hands of the hand picked Zionist/Talmudist establishment.

The attack on our once moral culture.

BBC 9/11 lies:

The BBC has always been a means of enforcing establishment propaganda, however they far exceeded their usual stupidity on the 29 August 2011, when they wrote an article attempting to discredit 9/11 conspiracy theories ten years after the dreadful event.  Their ludicrous, make believe facts completely rely on the possibility of so many coincidences as to make the American army, air force and establishment seem totally incompetent. What are the odds of such bad luck in the event of an actual attack from an outside source?  Slim to none.  

The BBC article, which you can view here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14665953 
Gives the impression that conspiracy theories are totally paranoid and unfounded.  Making the whole idea of questioning any official story seem an act of insanity.  As well as unpatriotic.  But in reality to question things is normal.  To accept without question is the true act of insanity.  Questioning leads to answers and truth.  Mindlessly believing everything the media tells us is not normal behaviour.  But we have been conditioned to never think or question anything by the indoctrinating education system.  And anyone who believes it wrong to question and research such things as 9/11, if a complete and utter moron.

The BBC post questions regarding 9/11 inconsistencies, then the conspiracy perspective, followed by the propaganda of lie of coincidences.

Here is what the BBC say:


*The question: Why did the world's most powerful air force fail to intercept any of the four hijacked planes?
*Conspiracy theorists say: The then US Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the military to stand down and not to intercept the planes.

 

*Official reports say: This was a highly unusual multiple hijacking with violence on board, and where the transponder, which identifies the plane, was turned off or changed.

What is more, a routine military training exercise happened to be taking place that day at US air defence command.

Air traffic controller Colin Scoggins was in constant contact with the military and did not see any lack of response. There was confusion and a lack of communication between the civilian air traffic control (FAA) and the military.

The military's equipment was also outdated and designed to look out over the ocean to deal with a Cold War threat.

 As you can see the very first response to the question is a coincidental training exercise.  Which was actually deliberately taking place so that the planes could not be intercepted when they were being flown in to buildings.  The planes were flown with military precision, by remote control in to the buildings.  For alleged hijackers to control the flight path towards, and in to a building so easily, is completely illogical.

*The question: Why did the Twin Towers collapse so quickly, within their own footprint, after fires on a few floors that lasted only for an hour or two?

*Conspiracy theorists say: The Twin Towers were destroyed by controlled demolitions. Theories relate to the rapid collapse (about 10 seconds), the relatively short-lived fires (56 minutes in World Trade Center 2 or 102 minutes in World Trade Center 1), reports of the sounds of explosions shortly before the collapse, and the violent ejections that could be seen at some windows many floors below the collapse.

*Official reports say: An extensive inquiry by the National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the planes severed and damaged support columns and dislodged fire-proofing.

Around 10,000 gallons of jet fuel were spewed over many floors starting widespread fires. Temperatures of up to 1,000C caused the floors to sag and the perimeter columns to bend, causing the sounds of "explosions".

The massive weight of the floors dropped, creating a dynamic load far in excess of what the columns were designed for. Debris was forced out of the windows as the floors above collapsed.

Controlled demolition is nearly always carried out from the bottom floors up, yet this collapse started at the top.

No evidence has ever been found of explosive charges despite the extensive hand searches and there is no evidence of any pre-cutting of columns or walls, which is routinely carried out in a controlled demolition.

 Explosions were heard in the basement - which was blasted out before the collapse to make way for the controlled demolition.

The damage from the planes was not severe enough to cause a complete collapse.  Had there not been explosives, a few floors surrounding the hit may or may not have collapsed on to lower floors.  But the building would have remained standing.

In my video 9/11 truth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziuSb7OCGes 

Images show a woman standing at the edge of the building where the plane hit - had the damage been severe enough to cause several floors to collapse she would not have been able to stand there and look over the edge.  Plus, had the fires been so hot and fierce she would not have stood there - she would either be burning alive or making her escape from the flames.  This suggests the fire was dying out.

In regards to the jet fuel spillage - there is no way 10,000 gallons were spewed over many floors.  Most of the jet fuel was consumed in the fireball that resulted from the initial impact.  About two thirds of the jet fuel was burnt up in about ten minutes.  The fireball burnt outside of the building.

The steel frame needed a much hotter temperature than the fires from the plane hit to buckle or melt.  (As molten steel was found in the debris upto six weeks after the event - which is the result of thermite explosives).

Much of the debris was removed amd destroyed before a full investigation could even start.

*The question: How could an amateur pilot fly a commercial plane in a complicated manoeuvre and crash it into the headquarters of the world's most powerful military, 78 minutes after the first report of a possible hijack and leave no trace?
*Conspiracy theorists say: A commercial Boeing 757 did not hit the building but instead a missile, a small aircraft or an unmanned drone was used. But since evidence has increasingly shown that the American Airlines Flight 77 did hit the building, the emphasis has shifted to questioning the difficult approach manoeuvre. It is argued it was not under the control of al-Qaeda but the Pentagon itself.

*Official reports say: Airplane wreckage, including the black boxes, were recovered from the scene and they were catalogued by the FBI.

Although some early video did not show much wreckage, there is a good deal of video and still photography which shows plane wreckage and evidence of the flight path, such as broken lamp posts.

The remains of crew and passengers on the plane were found and positively identified by DNA. Witnesses also saw the plane strike the Pentagon. 

 Very little plane wreckage was recovered at all.  The hijacker supposedly flew round in a circle to hit the pentagon from the other side - which wasn't designed to withstand it.  And flew downwards towards the pentagon - pulling upwards to make a direct hit - making a tiny hole, but leaving no trace of the more indestructible parts of the plane such as the engines.  Pilots for 9/11 truth have even stated that such a difficult manoeuvre, for an amateur pilot, capable of flying only very small planes, is impossible.  Even for a skilled pilot it would be extremely difficult.  The pentagon was hit by something much smaller - that was also remote controlled.  And the FAKE debris was planted afterwards.  The supporting collumns of the pentagon where the plane supposedly hit and vanished in to thin air - were undamaged.  Windows surrounding the hole were still intact.  Had the official story been true the collumns would be damaged or knocked out of place and the windows would have been smashed by the plane nose, tail and initial impact.

*The question: Why was the crash site at Shanksville, Pennsylvania, so small and why was the aircraft debris not visible?
*Conspiracy theorists argue: United Airlines flight 93 was shot down by a missile and disintegrated in mid air, scattering the wreckage over a large area.

 

*Official reports say: There are clear photographs showing aircraft wreckage and the cockpit voice recorder, which showed there had been a passenger revolt and the hijackers had deliberately crashed the plane.

Initial theories that heavy debris was scattered many miles from the main crash site turned out to be false. In fact the wind had blown light debris such as paper and insulation just over a mile.

Another theory was based on a misquote from the local coroner, Wally Miller, who said he stopped being a coroner after about 20 minutes because there were no bodies. What he also said was that he quickly realised it was a plane crash and there would have to be a large funeral service for the many victims.

In addition, the military never gave orders to the air force to shoot the commercial airliner down. 

 The official story claims that there was a passanger revolt and the proof of this is on the salavaged flight recorder, however that information was never made public.  And the wreckage on the ground in no matched what would be expected, if the plane had indeed crashed.  This particular flight has more questions than answers.  

*The question: How could a skyscraper, which was not hit by a plane, collapse so quickly and symmetrically, when no other steel-framed skyscraper has collapsed because of fire?

*Conspiracy theorists say: The World Trade Center Building 7 was destroyed by a controlled demolition using both explosives and incendiaries.

Initially the focus was on the phrase "pull it" used by the owner, Larry Silverstein, in a TV interview. But in fact he was talking about pulling firefighters back. (Demolition experts do not use the term "pull it" as slang for setting off explosives.)

Now the focus has shifted to the speed of the collapse which reached near free fall for 2.25 seconds. It is argued only explosives could make it collapse so quickly and symmetrically.

Some scientists, who are sceptical of the official account, have examined four dust samples from Ground Zero and claim to have found thermitic material which reacts violently when heated up. They claim tonnes of thermite and conventional explosives were rigged inside, not just WTC7, but also the Twin Towers.

*Official reports say: A three-year investigation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the building collapsed because of uncontrolled fires, started by the collapse of the nearby North Tower, and which burnt for seven hours.

The mains water feeding the emergency sprinkler system was severed. No evidence has ever been found of explosive charges and there are no recordings of a series of very loud explosions that would have been expected with controlled demolition.

Furthermore, there is an alternative explanation for the "thermitic material" the sceptical scientists found in the dust - it is just a type of primer paint. It's calculated 1,200,000 tonnes of building materials were pulverised at the World Trade Center and most minerals are present in the dust (not necessarily in a large quantity). More extensive sampling of the dust has not found any evidence of thermite or explosives, says a report from the US Geological Survey and another from RJ Lee. 

WTC building 7 was barely damaged, and only suffered small isolated fires.  It collapsed in the style of a controlled demolition - just like the twin towers did.  

The sentence 'pull it' by Larry Silverstein - was directed towards the building itself and not as the BBC suggests the firemen - because one would never refer to men as 'it'.  If it had been a case of pulling the firemen out of the building he would have said it directly as in 'pull them out'.  Larry Silversteins interview can also be seen on my video 9/11 truth.  And you can see for yourself that he was referring to the building.

'Pull it' is a building term for controlled demolition.

Explosives were heard and blasts can be seen in the collapse footage for the twin towers - building seven fell in the exact same style and fell quickly, with no damage to the surrounding buildings.  

The BBC repeatedly claim that conspiracy theorists shift their argument, however what actually happens is questioning the official claim of such coincidences.  When one part of an argument is covered up by the BBC lies, conspiracy theorists question another inconsistency regarding the same issue.  It is known as 'debate'.  Not argument shifting as the media would have you believe.

The BBC carefully choose their words, making sure that their readers react a certain way, in this case the readers response is to believe conspiracy theories as far fetched, and theorists as unable to make and stick to a valid point.  The media often lead their viewers/readers to a set conclusion - and not many people see through it.

Do not listen to the official lies, think for yourself.  Do some research.  Always question the lies of the media.

9/11 The truth:

TV, mind control and hypnotism:

Police Brutality:

However bad you think the American police state is, England is much worse.

In England we are not allowed to carry firearms, or any kind of defense at all.  In America, the civilians are only just beginning to be disarmed.  England has been rendered defenseless for years now.

The police do not exist to fight crime against the people, they enforce the ridiculous laws and restrictions of human rights against the people.  The government use the police to brutally suppress and control the masses.  The police merely obey orders from above, and will think nothing of shooting, beating to a pulp, using a taser or pepper spray against an unarmed and harmless civilian - just because they have been commanded to do so, or plainly because they can.

At many protests the plain clothes police are sent in to commit acts of violence, discrediting the peaceful protesters all together in the public view.  And the fancy dressed 'pigs in blankets', violently attack the harmless and peaceful protesters with such force and brutality - without so much as a second thought or reprimand for their actions.

The government and their fascist bully boy protection racket, do not see civilians as humans with thoughts and feelings - they see us a sheeple.  And remain indifferent to the pain they inflict upon the masses.  Their only plan is to serve themselves at our expense.  Enslaving and dictating us.

How much longer are we going to take such unjust treatment?!  Are we going to wait until it is too late and we're being killed off in huge numbers?!

The government work for the Zionist elite.  Who believe that they're chosen by their demon God, to rule over and enslave mankind.  (So who are the real racial supremacists)  This is something they're already doing.  If you don't believe it, look at what the police and government are doing to your country, your people?!  Surely anyone with even limited intelligence can sense that something is not right.  We are living under the real dictatorship, in England!
Act now while there is still some freedom.  So far the chains that bind you are only mental and financial, soon they will be physical as well.

Social networking, tracking your every key stroke:

Social networks such as facebook, bebo, myspace, twitter, all have one major purpose. This is most definitely not to help people connect with old friends. Or make new ones, as we are led to believe. It exists, because it allows the government to keep tabs on us, even more so. But, also the quizzes, or games involved on these networks, allow the government to tap in to your mind. Tracking your thought and understanding the patterns you think in. Thus allowing them to work out whether you are a threat to the establishment. Plus they can use the information to find new ways to control and convince you of their lies. It allows a psychological profile of you to be created.  Perhaps you have heard of these?  They are generally used to capture criminals.  Are you a criminal?  If not, do you welcome the idea of being treated like one?!

In tracing your every thought, feeling, comment, quiz result, they have the ability to predict the kind of moves you make. Or indeed, would make in certain situations. This obviously gives them an unfair advantage over you. Every phone conversation, email, text message, website and TV programme you send or view is monitored. For example, sky plus, allows you to pause and rewind what you are watching. Which means the information is stored on incorporated hard drive. This information can be retrieved by the television provider, or anyone who has access to their information. Including, obviously, the security services, such as MI5, CIA, MOSSAD. Any of this information gives these services a look inside your mind.  Showing a clear picture or how it works. This is used to train people to be the same as everyone else. By creating stereo types and labelling behaviour, so as to control the masses by manipulating their individuality. Through fear mainly. Making the masses in to a 'one minded man made robot'. 

Individuality poses a threat to the NWO. If we never question anything, never think for ourselves, then we never find out the truth of any situation. Individuality, allows us to behave and think freely stopping any kind of mind control from taking effect.

The official media, is a tool. It is used to stop individual thought. This is enforced, by the media telling us only the stories that the Zionist leaders want us to hear. They tell whomever is listening how to think, how to react. The official news only includes "what we are supposed to know" never the "whole truth". And certainly, never any story that doesn't help further impose the NWO. Mindlessly people sit in front of their televisions, day and night watching stupid, deliberately mind numbing programs (that destroy our morals and individual thoughts). The official media's lies, allows the TV to think for the viewer. And forms their opinions without anyone realising. Because we are given an irrelevant and pointless choice - of pre-chosen (for us) debates, such as, 'whether which official media's opinion to trust' or 'which TV programme is better', such silly decisions lead us to believe we are free to think for ourselves. Yet these allowed decisions, have been planted to stop us from realising we are controlled.

Another unknown source of hidden control would be "parties". We choose who we follow, based on who and what we believe. Yet these parties are all controlled. They were created by our enemies for that purpose. They allow us to feel we are going against the NWO. And fighting control. But in fact these parties keep us from ever being a threat. Because they are all deliberately led by idiots, who can barely even spell their own name. These leaders spout absolute nonsense, knowing nothing factual about the topic at hand. In fact the only information they have access to, is all mainstream media clap trap. Once they have given their controlled speech, they pat themselves on the back for doing such a great job. Then get drunk and reckless. (Such is the case of the ever retarded BNP, EDL and WNP). Nothing ever gets done. No plans to fix things are EVER made. Anyone following these groups, is kept too firmly in line for any progress to ever be made. They're under the impression that they're receiving the correct information (thus eliminating any threat of individual thought). Members of such groups are kept distracted. So that they can never be a danger to the NWO. Each party has a particular distraction in mind. The idea is to keep the followers focused on that one distraction. For example, convincing them to hate certain races. Or to disagree with other parties. Partaking in petty squabbles. This childish finger pointing keeps the followers, from ever actually knowing what the real problems are.

With the advent of CCTV, every interaction you make in public is recorded. With the Internet, you do not even have to leave your home to be monitored. Every aspect of our lives is recorded. Every choice we make is carefully crafted for us. To ensure that we cannot make any independent choices. When George Orwell wrote 1984, he could only dream of the possibilities of surveillance. The reality we live in is far more controlled and manipulated than anything George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, or any of the other visionaries of the last century could have feared. The only thing that is for certain is that everything is going to get much much worse. You are willingly building your own prison, by volunteering information. Refusing to see the horrendous police state which should be obvious for anyone to see. If you don't want your children to be literal slaves, you had better do something about it now!

Corruption of an innocent mind:

The story of Thomas Lobel is one that should shock and appall even the most liberal of minds.  An 11 year old Californian boy raised by two lesbian women, Thomas Lobel has been subjected to hormone blocking drugs since summer this year.  The guardians of this seriously misguided and confused boy attempt to justify their decision, by stating that Thomas was detached and failed to interact before this act of gross mistreatment took place.  The two women, Debra Lobel and Pauline Moreno claim that since partaking in hormone blocking drugs, Thomas (or Tammy as they moronically refer to the boy) has suddenly changed in to a much more responsive child.  Perhaps this sudden transformation can be attributed to the now slight ability to relate to his female guardians.

Raised solely by female authority figures, Thomas can posses little or no ability to relate to a male authority figure - as all healthy children should, to provide them with a well balanced upbringing.  This lack of a male to bond with has obviously played a great part in the mental state of this discombobulated child.

Another undeniable element is the ever disturbing situation in which he is being raised.  A young child growing up in an unnatural environment, such as a lesbian partnership, is clearly going to suffer from experiencing such sickening debauchery.  Children are a product of their environment.  They follow the example set by their main influence, parents.  The sexual preference and narrow minded views of Thomas trustees have destroyed his innocent mind.  There is little doubt that Thomas was coerced in to his supposed decision.  And one can only assume that this is due to his mind being poisoned from birth by man hating lesbians.

In a stable and sane society, mental illnesses such as 'gender identity disorder' would be treated.  Instead the sufferers have their unfortunate aberration greatly indulged - by dangerous chemical ill-treatment and genital mutilation.  However, in this allegedly progressive lifetime the politically correct liberal minded public deem aiding mental disorders as a form of cruelty.  The true form of cruelty is to treat this illness as a case of being born in to the wrong body - this lie allows the mental problem to be accepted as normal.  Resulting in the use of drugs and surgery to mask the symptoms of the sufferer.  Unfortunately, this has long been the Mal-practice of so called medical professionals.

Here is the orginial article from the daily mail:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2043345/The-California-boy-11-undergoing-hormone-blocking-treatment.html

Thomas Lobel's confused mentality could easily be resolved by removing the negative atmosphere caused by his perverted carers.  With a male influence to allow the natural and healthy development all children need, Thomas could perhaps begin to relate to his own gender and accept himself for who he is.  With counselling and other forms of help there would be no need for such abuse as hormone blocking drugs and sex change surgery.  Pauline Moreno and Debra Lobel should be referred to social services for their hand in this disgusting situation.

Michael Jackson: