Sunday, 17 June 2012

Home education

Home education is often considered strange, or inadequate in comparison to the state education/indoctrination system, but where does the queer belief that we are unqualified, or even incapable of educating our own children come from?!  This unfounded and astonishingly insulting belief that we are so incompetent, as to not be able to guide our children intellectually comes from the education system itself; the schooling system enforces the ideology that we exist to serve and obey a higher authority; furthermore, we are incapable of thinking beyond our given orders.  School teachers, particularly primary school teachers, often give the impression of always being right and thus push the idea that to question the school system is tantamount to educational heresy.

But where does this unnatural subservient behaviour begin?  At first glance, we assume it begins in the school.  But for most children, it begins long before the school years.  Most nurseries will take children from about six weeks old onwards.  This is nothing short of child abuse.
And not only this, nurseries and schools both send your child spiralling backwards, knocking any information they have gained from their parents or family out of their minds and replacing it with savagery such as finger painting - a tragic waste of a would be brilliant mind.  Children are not stupid, their intelligence and abilities should be recognised, and we should help them to reach their full potential.  A child's mind is like a sponge, willing and ready to soak up new information - do you really want to allow your child's abilities to be stifled by the retarded TV programmes that cause speech impediments, or the state that patronise them and treat them as vegetables?!

Nurseries 'officially' exist to allow parents a break from their child, the chance to return to work or to allow the child to socialise and develop.  This is a slightly sugar coated version of the truth, to say the least.  Nurseries exist to reinforce the idea that children are an unnecessary hassle, that we can dump off with strangers.  It establishes the belief that to stay at home and raise ones own children is oppressive.
Women are expected to give up the most important role they could ever experience, motherhood, in order to pursue a life of slavery.  As well as damaging to a woman, this also has an extremely negative effect on the child.
A child raised by the state will not experience the love of a mother and father, combined with the needed attention for individual development, and not forgetting the loving discipline only provided by a parent.  No, a child raised by the state experiences indifference, separation, harsh discipline designed only to create a compliant servant to the oppressive establishment.

During the days of bra burning, women were convinced by an establishment controlled organisation that it was 'their right to work', in other words, their right to be enslaved just as men were.  This was orchestrated to further destroy and separate the family, as well as create a whole new wave of servile employees, taken from the middle class - (as the lower class of women had been enslaved for centuries under appalling conditions) -  allowing more servants to create a constant supply of consumerist materialist rubbish, for the lower classes to obsess over - in order to prevent any lower class of people from ever establishing wealth from years of scrimping and saving.   In my article Radical feminists - man hating lesbians:  I go in to much greater detail about this subject.

Education was once only available to the upper class, in order for them to obtain a managerial position above the working class.  It maintained the class system up until the industrial revolution, in 1750 to 1850 - when education was made available to the lower classes as a means to control, as well as allow the ruling classes to employ competent servants.
This did not destroy the class system, the class system is still very much alive even today. 
A common misconception about the industrial revolution is that living standards of the masses (lower classes) were improved and increased, this is a barefaced lie. 
During this time, when children were forced to work to survive, a classic case of cruel employment was sweeping the chimneys of the rich, while they were still lit, how many poor children lost their lives, or were at least severely damaged by this experience?! 
The introduction of the lower class education system was not to introduce equality, or to allow the servants a chance to better themselves, it was simply to allow them to comply with the new standard of living, the consumerist lifestyle.

The education the working class receives today is no different, we are still taught to obey and serve.  The education that the ruling classes receive is the same as it was then, it teaches them to control or manage the workers.  They receive a proper education that shapes them in to our rulers.  We receive indoctrination that breaks us down with mental torture until we are only capable of following orders without question.
The state schools teach our children to answer questions with provided examples - in other words to mimic their propaganda.  Our imagination is destroyed, and we are sent spiralling backwards from the moment the state takes control of our so called education.
Children are taught to respond to bells, each bell ring informing the child that it is the start or end of a lesson, break or dinner time etc.  This is a form of torture in itself, being forced to accept that ones actions are determined by a mere bell.
Soviet psychiatrist Ivan Pavlov used this method of ringing a bell to signify that it was meal time on dogs - who would then salivate upon the ringing of the bell despite the fact that no food had been placed in front of them - a most cruel torture to say the least.  And this torture is used in schools.

Home school and state school statistics:

Those who fall for the idea that only schools can provide a satisfactory education also tend to believe that home schooled children are odd, and will not be able to fit in to society.  This idea is unfortunate and shows a great deal of ignorance.  Home schooled children have a much higher rate of success - since they are working at level that suits their individual needs, rather than at the rate of a class of around thirty students, in which those with potential suffer a great deal due to the teacher being preoccupied with the less advanced students. 

Children who attend schools will be subjected to humiliation when they make a mistake, or fail to fit in with the more popular children - possibly through not being 'exactly' the same as everyone else, or not having the same materialistic plastic rubbish as the other children.  Teachers will embarrass their students should they answer something wrong in haste, instead of being taken aside and allowed a chance to think more carefully about the question and appropriate answer.  This humiliation forces children to rebel against the education itself, and to fail to form friendships throughout its school life, possible even in its adult life.
Another problem of the school system is the added fact that we entrust our children in the hands of strangers, need I say more?!  Would you leave your child in the hands of a stranger in the street?  What is the difference?!  Paedophiles will always find ways to get close to children - schools and nurseries allow these degenerates to be employed in roles that greatly affect our children, our children are left at the mercy of these people.
And of course let us not forget that in school our children may meet children that will lead them astray and teach them disgusting and dangerous habits.  Innocent and decent children who have been raised well, may easily be influenced by children who have not been raised properly.

We should never allow the state to convince us that we are incapable of providing our children with a worthy education.  There are plenty of sources out there to help us along, and once a child can read and write the education process becomes a lot easier and a lot more interesting for both parent and child.
Do not think of educating your child as an inconvenience, it is your duty to ensure your child has the greatest start in life.  It is a wonderful experience and highly rewarding to both you and your child/children.

In the hope that people will take notice I have prepared some sources of information to help you on your way:
Join your local library, take your children to local museums and such, teach them about nature, and their own culture as well as others.  Look in charity shops for books to practise reading.  Buy arts and crafts to help build their artistic skills and interests.  Home education is not subject to the strict and backwards school curriculum.  Please further research the subject and make your own mind up.  I hope the links are useful.

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

Media fear mongering, as always.

Wednesday the 2nd of may (2012) marked the official one year anniversary of the death of Osama Bin Laden.  And of course the media, in remembrance of the CIA official Osama, have marked the occasion with fake terrorist threats and fear mongering in preparation of the 2012 Olympics.
Happily ignoring the fact that Mr CIA official Bin Laden has been dead since 2001.  He died of natural causes in the care of a CIA hospital. 
The official story involves Osama Bin Laden's body being buried at sea within 24hours of his alleged death.  The media pushes the idea that this was in keeping with the practice of the Islamic beliefs.  Although of course it is a cover up.  Bin Laden at sea.
If Bin Laden had not been a CIA official, and had actually been an independent terrorist (rather than state owned terrorist) he would not have been shown such compassion as this.  His body would have been brought back for a proper examination - with proof shown to the public that it was truly him.  And he would have been made an example of.  But of course, since Bin Laden died ten years earlier, it would have been pretty difficult to gain such proof and so a cover up was needed.

But the 2011 lie of catching and murdering Bin Laden has definitely served its purpose, it has allowed the establishment controlled media to further install fear in to the minds of the masses, with a constant bombardment of terrorist threats.  As well as restrictions of freedom.  And not forgetting the extreme measures to attack, I mean protect the people, such as army bases and missile launchers.  But rest assured, these means are for your own safety and will removed after the Olympics... Sounds like a very familiar lie, doesn't it?!
The missile launchers will most definitely not be removed.  They are just a starting point for the rest of the country.  They will appear every way as an alleged safety measure after the establishment orchestrated terrorist attack on London.  But instead of being there to protect us, they will be there to prevent us from defending ourselves from the people who actually want to kill us - the Zionist establishment!
Missile launchers.
This article attempts to promote the idea of missile launchers being placed in London.  If there is such a worry of terrorism, why allow the Olympics to take place if it is such an obvious or suspected target?!

Since Bin Laden's 'official death', many threats of terrorism, and fake attempts have been carried out to scare the public in to further submitting their freedom - as well as to prepare us all for the establishments attack on the Olympics. 
This article refers to one such fake attempt:  Establishment propaganda.
It is possible that the alleged terrorist was also a part of the CIA.  Or, perhaps they just decided to pick someone at random to further promote the growing war in innocent countries.  Remember this, to the people at the very top - Zionists - we are little more than insects that they will happily squash.  No one knows who is at the top, because they have so many levels of servants working for them.  To protect their identities they ensure that no one knows more than two levels above themselves.  And this is the case in all forms of slavery these days, I mean employment. 
This fake terrorist attempt was also enough to justify full body scanners.  Such an invasion of privacy should never be allowed.  But since it is only their to protect you, why would you question it?!  In reality however, it is only their to enslave you.  To restrict your freedom and prevent you from ever protecting yourself from the establishment. 
It is not the first time the Zionist establishment have attempted to control and enslave us.  In fact they have tried and failed at this countless times.  Which is why this attempt involved a great deal of intellect and planning.  Years of working towards their goal was involved, and the outcome?!  They have us exactly where they want us.  Many events in history led up to these people gaining control.  And the only reason we are unaware of it is because we have swallowed all of the lies and the truth has been hidden and forgotten.
They have taken such precautions this time, not only are we unaware of their plan to destroy us, but also we are completely at their mercy, unprepared and unable to protect ourselves from anything they do to us.

The London Olympics has been deliberately built on a radioactive site.  And the establishment know this.  The official lie is that this radioactive waste is low threat - this is just to convince us that it is no danger.  However even low threat radioactive waste is extremely dangerous and will still harm us.  It is the classic lie that low levels of poison are safe - are we really stupid enough to believe this?!
Apparently so, because we also believe that microwaves are safe - microwaves radiate our food - in other words they make our food radioactive and kill any of the foods nutritional value, replacing it with cancer causing radiation.

As seen in this image, the Olympic stadium consists of the typical Zionist symbolism, look at the lights - they are shaped as pyramids with the capstone missing/separated and the all seeing eye.  This kind of symbolism can be seen all over England, and many other countries.  It is a sign of their control over us.  And is portrayed on most architecture these days.  Once you learn what their symbolism looks like and means, you will begin to notice just how many buildings, films, money notes etc are used to show this symbolism. 

Look at this image carefully, what do you see you?  If like most people you simply see the 2012 London Olympics symbol, you need to look again.
Do you see the dot in the middle?  Look at the image below to see why that dot is there...

Do you see now?  It spells out 'Zion'.  And if you are daft enough to consider the dot a coincidence, think again.  The dot only makes sense if it is meant to spell out the word Zion.  And the symbol was not just designed by chance, and the dot was not a simply mistake - it was planned out and created as it was meant to be - to spell out 'Zion'.
This is another example of the kind of symbolism they use.  It all serves a purpose.  We are influenced and affected by thing our conscious mind doesn't even notice.  Because our unconscious/subconscious mind is aware of it.  That is how brain washing affects us - by speaking to your subconscious they can hypnotise and control you - without your conscious mind ever realising it.  Certain imagery, or words spoken will only reach us on a subconscious level - in order to speak to our subconscious they have to hide their meaning in plain site so as not to awaken our suspicious conscious mind.
And if you think this is all a bit far fetched - think on.  They have the means to brainwash/hypnotise masses of people all at the same time TV, media and the internet etc.  And through many forms of manipulation, as well as psychological testing (creating psychological profiles - used to catch criminals) - we have volunteered our thoughts and information - providing them with adequate information to easily corrupt masses of people all at the same time. 

Let us look at another form of symbolism regarding the 2012 olympics.  What do you see here?!
The mascot on the left has on top of it, a pyramid with an eye.  One of the very common forms of symbolism used by Zionists - it is the all seeing eye.
Also the mascot on the left is a phalic symbol - which not only represents the corruption of innocent minds, but also it is the worship of Nimrod - also known as Baal the sun God.  True meaning of Easter - Ishtar. Sun worship.
Both mascots have only one eye - which is of course the all seeing eye - and is why many singers on their pictures have one eye covered, or one eye with a flash of lightning painted over it - to accentuate the one eye.

It doesn't take much to see what is going on here.  Research it for yourself and come to your own conclusion.  Never accept the official media stories, or anything else to that effect.  Question everything.

For anyone who reads the news, or watches it for that matter - you will probably have noticed that we are being deliberately scared by the stories.  And desensitised to the violence.  The best way to create a subservient people is to scare them in to submission.  And this is exactly what the establishment are doing.  Please see my other articles on the Olympics, as well as my information on 9/11.  And research it all for yourself.  Questioning everything is not a negative thing, it is perfectly natural.  We should question things.  To mindlessly accept everything we are told is unnatural and very destructive.

Monday, 30 April 2012

The damage caused by a constant bombardment of sexual imagery?!

The modern film industry thrives by promoting a constant sexual theme, to further destroy the already heavily debauched and enslaved masses.  This sexual theme has been damaging our mentality ever since it became accepted as a conventional means of 'entertainment'.  It has allowed the ideology that we should 'lust after everything in sight' to become accepted as normal human behaviour - it is not.  As intelligent humans, it is in our nature to be with just one person for the rest of lives - to be monogamous and content with that one person.  But the evil film industry promotes the idea that we should be unhappy with the one we are with, and therefore lust after everyone else - including prostitutes (porn stars and actresses/actors, singers) and every person we see on the street.  We are conditioned to look for someone close the 'look' we have been forced in to lusting after - but this supposed 'look' does not exist.  It is unrealistic to expect perfection - perfection does not exist, why else would the make up artists have to plaster their clients in a mask to cover what they truly look like - and then the images have to be air brushed to further correct the supposed imperfections?!

But not only does the film industry push promiscuity and lust, it also convinces us that the people in these films - and the relationships they have are the kind of thing we should be looking for.  Often this includes a romantic display that we are supposed to seek - apparently spending large sums of money for a consumer established day (Valentines day for example) equals romance.  We are led to believe that the kind of relationships in these films are how relationships really ought to be.
Men and women both come to expect each other to always be perfect and to read each others minds.  Women are taught to accept their men masturbating over, or imagining other women during sex - which is not a good thing, it is a form of betrayal, we should be satisfied with the one we are with.  Not pining for something else.
Men are taught that they should be eyeing up every woman in sight, fantasising about other women and masturbating over them - this is not something either sex should be doing.  It is destructive and it destroys relationships.

We are also pushed to believe that commitment is something to fear.  Being single and promiscuous is glorified.  And relationships now instead of involving getting better acquainted with one another through conversation and over a long period of time, and allowing the relationship to progress slowly, to sleeping with someone straight away and occasionally bothering to learn the persons name, and sometimes favourite colour!

Pornography is another fine example of how such things influence our behaviour.  Pornography promotes the idea of experimenting (sleeping around with anyone or thing, regardless of the basic rules any moral human should abide by), it teaches us to accept perversions.  In fact it creates many perversions by destroying the minds of the people who watch it.  People who watch porn quickly become destroyed both mentality and emotionally by it.  It becomes an obsession and it leads to needing much worse depravity in order to excite oneself.  This is due to the fact that we become desensitised to such things very quickly.
The same goes for violence on TV - we see it so often that it longer horrifies us.  We pretty much grow up with such disgusting images.  Even the news makes a point of destroying our minds through fear mongering, by showing violent imagery.
Pornography desensitises us to disgusting and perverted imagery - and as time goes on less and less of this debauchery manages to disgust us.  We come to accept it as normal and thus seek further perversion to excite ourselves as we quickly become 'bored' with the things we have been desensitised to.

*A good example of this is Hugh Hefner, the playboy founder - his life of promiscuity and promotion of debauched imagery has left him unable to perform without the use of Viagra, as well as incapable of sustaining his artificial erection without the aide of homosexual male pornographic imagery as well as female homosexual acts being committed in front of him.*  See this article: Why all porn is gay.
This is exactly what porn does to people, it destroys us physically, mentally and emotionally.
It tears apart everything natural and decent - and replaces it with everything that is wrong and destructive.  Porn and the lie of 'sexual preference/lifestyle choice' is responsible for destroying the most wholesome thing in existence - the family.  A heterosexual relationship, based on love and devotion to one person for life.  Reproduction and monogamy and key aspects in heterosexual relations.  Although our natural instincts have been reconditioned so that we accept everything unnatural.  Thanks to TV, Pornography and other such negative influences - monogamy has become considered unnatural by the brain washed.  Such negative influences promote promiscuity and enslavement to lust.

Homosexuality promotes promiscuity.  There is no loving bond or chance of procreation to form a monogamous attachment.  Promiscuity is typically a homosexual act.  And we have been programmed to respond to the same form of mentality. 
Political correctness ignores the fact that most homosexuals come from broken families or have been abused as children - thus stifling their ability to form reasonable and even loving relationships with the opposite sex.  Instead of allowing their mental instability to dominate and destroy their lives - we should be helping them!  The same goes for those who would wish to mutilate their body - because they are convinced they are in the wrong body!  These people need our help, what they don't need is for us to go along with their madness and tell them they are normal.  We are helping them to destroy themselves in doing that! 
If someone went to a doctor and claimed to be a fish trapped in a mans body, would the NHS pay for reconstructive surgery to slap on some fins and gills?!  I seriously doubt it, but it is the exact same kind of insanity as wishing to have ones privates mutilated.  One cannot change their chromosomes.

What we desperately need to do is turn away from TV and other controlled forms of entertainment.  Return to entertaining ourselves through conversation, board/card games and walks in nature etc.  We have to regain our connection with everything that is natural.  The city life is not normal, nor good for ones mentality.  Much has been destroyed, but it can be rebuilt if we help our fellow man and refuse to accept the lies we have been fed.  To stand out and refuse to be a part of the madness is truly difficult.  But better that, than to be a silent part of the ever growing problem.

Thursday, 26 April 2012

Music industry role models?

The ever influential music/video industry is a well known source for selling sex, especially to the young and impressionable, whom it is deliberately aimed at.  New singers magically appear from nowhere, real talent is not even a necessity so long as they have the 'look' the establishment prefer.  In other words so long as they are an anorexic whore, willing to sell their body and make a disgusting display of themselves in general.  Morals are definitely not allowed in the music business. 

In order to be, and remain a part of the music industry, one must be willing to fully degrade themselves.  And to destroy the people they aim their music at - 'children'.  It is no secret that music videos all display a very unhealthy sexual theme - and promote a dangerous attitude towards the body and promiscuity.  Both male and female children are bombarded with this form of debauchery from birth, since it is near impossible to escape.  It is practically everywhere - TV, billboards, magazines, films, cartoons, newspapers and the Internet.  Even if you don't deliberately go looking for such things, they are easy to run in to.  And so our children grow up with a detrimental view to adulthood and the world.

Many singers promote an almost acceptable image to begin with.  Perhaps a religious and moral one.  But as always this is just a front.  It is a stage to give the impression that the singer is a good role model.  Not only does this convince parents that their children are listening to something acceptable, it also assists your child's conversion from being an acceptable, innocent and decent child - to being promiscuous, body obsessed and debauched.  The singer alters from being a fairly satisfactory role model - to being a degenerate whore.  To the child this then becomes an acceptable form of behaviour - and the child mimics what it sees.  The female child will begin to dress and act like a degenerate whore.  And the male child influenced by the same thing will begin to objectify women.  As well as be brainwashed in to masturbation and obsession with sex.  Both sexes are destroyed and persuaded to act in a most depraved manner.  Children are being led to believe that in order to be 'cool' or an adult, they must be having sex and being promiscuous (promiscuity has been taught as 'experimenting'.  It is pushed as a good thing, but it most definitely is not).

Promiscuity is mentally, emotionally and physically damaging to both men and women.  I do not just mean sexually transmitted diseases.  I mean the ignored dangers of promiscuity.  The lying government and sex education workers (paedophiles) simply recommend contraception as a means of avoiding diseases and unwanted pregnancy.  But the far more important issue is ignored - children should not be having sex.  They should be climbing trees or playing with friends - and other such harmless things.  Children should be allowed a childhood.  And as such they need protecting from the evils of the world.  Unfortunately, we have been conditioned to accept the way things are as normal.  They are not normal.

In order to protect your children you have to also protect yourself.  Do not watch TV, or films that are harmful to the mind - which is just about everything these days.  Do not read the opinion forming magazines and newspapers.  And attempt to avoid (wherever possible) pornographic imagery, including music videos and lyrics.  Porn should not even exist.  It is a disgusting display that encourages us to be slaves to our lusts, to objectify and to covet every male or female; to want everyone and never be faithful or satisfied with one person.  Porn destroys the mind and prevents both men and women from being able to partake in a normal and healthy 'monogamous' relationship with just one partner for life.

For women/young girls who sleep around they run the risk of cervical cancer.  For men/young boys prostate cancer.  Something often covered up by the authorities.  But also the mental and emotional issues are important.  Both sexes will fail to establish their self worth due to the lies they have been bombarded with - leading to low self esteem.  Both sexes will be unable to form respectable relationships with the opposite sex - thus leading to many meaningless and hurtful one night stands and flings.  Depression will follow - and with that more than likely prescribed poison, I mean medication;  which will further destroy the mind, emotions and body of the victims.

One of the worst perversions ever pushed in the music industry is paedophilia.  Such things as singers dressing like children; in school uniforms and such promote sexual interest in children.  This perversion is also promoting the idea that all school girls should act like sluts in order to be 'popular'.
Here is an example of a singer damaging the mentality of her fans:  Slutty displays.  
Note the shoes that say 'fuck', yes that is a great message to send out to young girls and boys!  

Rihanna is just one of the many celebrities to glorify promiscuity and sexual interest in school girls (children).  Britany Spears became famous for it.  Are these really the kind of role models we want for our children?
And like many celebrities, Britany is also guilty of the change from religious role model - to slapper.  As well as her sickening change to whoredom, she is also guilty of making a mockery of marriage.  This is not the sort of attitude that should be promoted by anyone.  Nor should the idea of idolising talentless people for simply taking their clothes off, or opening their legs.  We should have no respect for people like that.  In fact we should be disgusted with them for destroying our future generations.  It is never too late to save our children from this evil.